Follow The Stir

Flicks

7 Reasons 'Liz & Dick' Was Totally Worth Watching (No, I Wasn't Drunk)

by Maressa Brown on November 26, 2012 at 12:50 PM

liz and dick promo still lifetimeWhen Lifetime first announced that they had cast Lindsay Lohan to portray Elizabeth Taylor in Liz & Dick, I was one of the first to cringe and roll her eyes. How on earth could troubled trainwreck Lindsay the best choice for this iconic role? Clearly, the network was grasping at straws and doing it as a publicity stunt. And then when the horrendous reviews rolled out, I was even more convinced there was no reason to waste my time and tune in. That is, until my mom was incredulous that I wouldn't be watching ...

As a fellow theatrical Pisces woman, she always felt a sort of cosmic bond to Liz and grew up watching her controversial romance with Dick play out in the media, so she wasn't gonna miss it for the world. So I figured I'd give it a shot and virtually "watch" with my mom, texting back and forth during commercial breaks. And even I cannot believe what happened next: I actually found the much-trashed flick watchable -- and entertaining! Gasp! Here, 7 reasons why ...

  1. Grant Bowler as Richard Burton: Lifetime may have had the audacity to cast LiLo as Liz, but they didn't really go off the deep end when they picked Bowler as Burton. Though he's probably not going to be winning an Emmy anytime soon, I thought the New Zealand actor did a fine job portraying the Welsh star.  
  2. The costumes: If you're a fan of late '50s, '60s, and early '70s fashion like I am, the costume design was a real treat. You could even watch the two-hour flick from beginning to end on mute just to take in the retro eye candy. Not to mention all that Taylor-Burton BLING! Oofah!
  3. The makeup: Like the costumes, the makeup itself was fun to check out. But what's even more impressive is that they managed to transform LiLo's face in many (not all) scenes to resemble Liz in an eerie way. There were a couple of scenes in particular -- shot from a bit of a distance -- in which it really worked to make you think for a split second that you were watching Taylor.
  4. The format: The flick's narration -- by a young, circa late '50s Liz and Dick who are sitting on a Inside the Actors Studio-style set -- helped offer some interesting insight into the couple's relationship.
  5. The script's focus: Zeroing in on Liz and Dick's relationship was a wise move. While I'm sure their story could have been given a deeper, more intelligent treatment by a better screenplay writer and cast, the fame-tainted romance is the perfect kind of juicy fodder that lends itself to a fluffy Lifetime flick.
  6. Lindsay Lohan's effort: Would I -- or any studio with some credibility out to make a quality flick -- have cast LiLo as Liz? Never. There were definitely scenes that were cringe-worthy -- and at times, I thought, "They have to be kidding, right?" -- and for the most part, you feel like you're watching Lindsay trying to play Liz Taylor -- NOT Liz Taylor. At the same time, she also didn't exactly screw it up as badly as I thought she would! There were scenes in which she was a perfectly acceptable made-for-TV, Lifetime network version of Taylor.
  7. It was exactly what it promised to be: A cheeseball, super-hyped, silly and yes, entertaining TV movie. NOT anything even remotely close to an Oscar contender. And if you watch it that way (as I did), you might be (as I was) actually, pleasantly surprised.

If you watched Liz & Dick, what'd you think? If not, would you watch it after reading about it?


Image via mylifetime.com

Filed Under: movies, lindsay lohan

Comments

8
  • leona24
    --

    leona24

    November 26, 2012 at 1:00 PM
    Got it on the dvr, just gotta find time to watch it!
  • Pinkmani
    --

    Pinkmani

    November 26, 2012 at 1:03 PM

    I don't see why people are dogging on Lindsay. She's back to acting which is much better than abusing drugs like she was before...


  • DiceK...
    --

    DiceKitten

    November 26, 2012 at 1:29 PM
    I enjoyed it. I thought Bowler was sexy as Burton. I found Elizabeth to be shallow. Who complains about the press than hires a photographer? It gave more insight into Elizabeth. Very well played. LiLo is making a comeback.
  • sweet...
    --

    sweetcherry_59

    November 26, 2012 at 1:48 PM

    I thought she did an ok job, not horrid, not great. For the most part, I liked the movie.


  • carly
    -- Nonmember comment from

    carly

    November 26, 2012 at 1:56 PM
    Creed Bratton. Those 10 seconds were the best in the whole movie.
  • Autum...
    --

    Autumnleaves87

    November 26, 2012 at 2:45 PM
    The movie was TERRIBLE!!!

    I'm sorry.. but I think we counted 6 glass objects being thrown (more like lobbed) at the wall by the end by Liz. Just too over dramatic.

    The terrible "I won't live without you!" Scene where Liz runs like a little girl to her room, grabs her pills and downs them with vodka. Again with the over dramatic..

    And I just couldnt get over her raspy, beat up throaty voice.. such a far cry from the real Liz.

    But it was entertaining still, I guess.
  • kiowa...
    --

    kiowagirl75

    November 26, 2012 at 2:59 PM
    it was a terrible movie and to cast Lindsay Lohan as Elizabeth Taylor was not a good choice.
  • kelti...
    --

    kelticmom

    November 27, 2012 at 12:25 AM
    It was like watching Courtney Love trying to play Princess Diana. Horrible. Ugh.
1-8 of 8 comments

To leave a comment, log in as a CafeMom member:

Log In

OR, use our non-member comment form: