When you think of Brad Pitt, "insecure" probably isn't the first word that comes to mind. But this latest doozy -- that I'm sure is true -- compliments of the National Enquirer, paints Brad as the picture of insecurity. Why? Oh, because his fiance Angelina Jolie has been secretly TiVoing episodes of her ex-husband Jonny Lee Miller's show and watching them behind his back.
With the kids!
That last part was meant to be read in a whisper.
The story -- which, for the record, is insane, but worth reporting -- claims that when Miller's show, Elementary, first came out, Angelina recorded it so she could "critique his acting performance and see how he's aged." After watching it, she supposedly couldn't stop talking about how much it sucked and how it was -- and I quote! -- "so bad she could barely make it through the entire episode." Yet! As the super credible report delves deeper, Angelina Jolie has been exposed as a die-hard Elementary watcher. Or, more accurately, a die-hard ex-husband watcher.
Apparently, Brad went into a "jealous rage" after unearthing an almost-full season's worth of Elementary episodes. You know, the show Angelina "hates." (When it's Opposite Day.) The tale goes that Angelina and her kids would watch the show when Dad was out of the house. Also, "Her daughters Zahara and Shiloh have a crush on Jonny, and Angelina’s boys think the show is cool too."
Wooooowwww. The boys think the show is cool, too. That's tough stuff right there. Dagger through the heart.
Do I think this story is true? Um, probably not, as it's completely absurd. But if you buy the whole "where there's smoke, there's fire" theory, maybe Brad is feeling insecure. You know why, though. That Chanel No. 5 ad. That thing was the exact opposite of "cool."
Do you think Angelina Jolie has been TiVoing Elementary?
Image via Ethan Miller/Getty


Moms Love Birthday Parties, Too!
Father Knows Best - Happy Father's Day!
Are Cheaters Entitled to Privacy? - A...
Road Trips Make Mommies Wild!

















Comments 4
"Do I think this story is true? Um, probably not, as it's completely absurd."
Seriously? You don't believe the story is true? Then why the hell did you write this lengthy, boring and ridiculous article that people will read only because of its headline, which promises WAY more than you deliver? And why the hell did you wait to tell us that at the END of your crappy article?
Why the hell DID you write this stupid article? My gosh - how desperate can you be? Show a little self-respect and don't grub with the swine over such obvious, hysterical attempts to find something to try to help you stay relevant so you can continue to write this dribble on this stupid site.
It happens too often: I forget how much I loathe this website - a loathing that comes from reasons just like this article you wrote, among many others - and then I see an interesting headline on another website and follow the link to this site. And every time I do this, I am reminded that I HATE this website.
You people are so irrelevant. How do you stand to look at yourselves in the mirror every day?
No. I don't think anything the Star says is true, and even if it is true, who cares?
Joanie why don't you tell us how you really feel? Why comment if it's going to be so hateful?
I think I've lost 4 minutes of my life I'll never get back.