Follow The Stir

OMG

Topless Kate Middleton Photos Seriously Cross the Line (VIDEO)

by Nicole Fabian-Weber on September 14, 2012 at 9:04 AM

Kate MiddletonThe royals just cannot catch a break lately. First, there was Harry, snapped letting ye royal jewels hang out in Vegas. Then there was Prince Philip, snapped letting ye olde royal jewels hang out at the Highland Games. Now there's Kate Middleton. The primmest and most proper of them all is currently undergoing a nude scandal of her own. A French magazine has just published, in a "grotesque manner", recent photos of the Duchess sunbathing topless at Prince William's cousin's chateau.

The "world exclusive" photos were taken using a long lens without the couple’s knowledge, and capture Kate, on a break from her and William's tour in Malaysia, clad in nothing but bikini bottoms.

Needless to say, she is pissed.

A statement released from St. James's Palace said: "Their Royal Highnesses have been hugely saddened to learn that a French publication and a photographer have invaded their privacy in such a grotesque and totally unjustifiable manner. The incident is reminiscent of the worst excesses of the press and paparazzi during the life of Diana, Princess of Wales, and all the more upsetting to the Duke and Duchess for being so."

As curious as I am to see these pictures of a bare-breasted Kate, I have to say, this truly does cross the line. Harry's Vegas antics were one thing -- he was partying and, in a way, "shirking his royal duties" (and it's Harry -- come on). But photos of Kate, lying out in the sun, not bothering anyone, in what she presumed to be (and what should have been) a "private" setting is whole other issue, and a complete invasion of privacy. Will paparazzi stop at nothing to make a buck?

The seriousness of the statement the Palace released shows they mean business, but I kind of doubt legal action will wind up being taken, since the photos were taken in another country. It's really sad that this has happened -- and it probably stings a bit more since all this is happening so close to the 15-year anniversary of Diana's death.

Apparently, the British media aren't the only people who will stop at nothing to make a profit. What a disgrace.

What do you think of this?

This video can not be viewed on The Stir Mobile.


Image via Chris Jackson/Getty

Filed Under: kate middleton

Comments

21
  • Carme...
    -- Facebook comment from

    Carmen Martin

    September 14, 2012 at 9:25 AM

    I hope no one blames her for this.  The photographers were the ones acting in an appalling fashion and they're the ones who deserve punishment.  There should be a law against taking nude photos of any kind and distributing them without the subject's consent. 


  • Michelle
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Michelle

    September 14, 2012 at 9:43 AM
    I hope she sues the photographer...that is INSANE. I am surprised they don't have pictures of her taking a dump. Geez! Let the girl sunbathe topless in the privacy of her own life! Horrible. Absolutely horrible.
  • paren...
    --

    parentalrights1

    September 14, 2012 at 10:02 AM

    I don't blame her. I hope the other royals aren't so bitchy as to give her grief.

    That being said,  paparazzi do this to celebrities all the time. Kate is no more special.


  • mb
    -- Nonmember comment from

    mb

    September 14, 2012 at 10:06 AM
    Your reasoning is ridiculous. She is a public figure. She knows she is a public figure. She walks down the street and people take pictures. All the time. Always. And what happens, well, she decides to go out in public and show her tits. And pictures are taken. What an idiotic faux outrage situation. Seriously.
  • ImaSo...
    --

    ImaSoulMom

    September 14, 2012 at 10:20 AM
    Is she not supposed to have breasts?
  • Prett...
    --

    PrettyGirlMyers

    September 14, 2012 at 10:33 AM

    Look, I understand she was in a place where going topless is acceptable practice, BUT, she is going to be the queen of England, she's heavily followed everywhere she goes by photographers. Taking her top off was just plain stupid.


  • sarah
    -- Nonmember comment from

    sarah

    September 14, 2012 at 10:34 AM
    I just wonder what made her think people wouldn't take pictures of her topless. I would think she might have thought it might be a bad idea to even risk it
  • elle7777
    --

    elle7777

    September 14, 2012 at 10:50 AM

    While that is unfortunate, being a public figure she should have known that there is the possibility of photographers lurking outdoors trying to get a shot....always.


  • Anon
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Anon

    September 14, 2012 at 11:32 AM
    She was at a private residence not strolling down a public beach or laying at a community pool. She had a reasonable expectation of privacy. And it shouldn't matter, nobody should have nude photos published of them for profit without their consent no matter where they originated.
  • Brittany
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Brittany

    September 14, 2012 at 12:09 PM
    Many celebrities have moved to France because of their privacy laws regarding paparazzi...how did the privacy laws not prevent this from happening? It's unfair to her (royalty or not) that she can't even let her guard down and do what she wants in a private home. Royalty, public figures, whatever...aren't they people too? I feel bad that they have every aspect of their lives talked about and scrutinized.
1-10 of 21 comments

To leave a comment, log in as a CafeMom member:

Log In

OR, use our non-member comment form: