Follow The Stir

GossipMonger

Robert Pattinson & Kristen Stewart's Breakup Might Be Totally Fake

by Maressa Brown on August 20, 2012 at 11:49 AM

robert pattinsonWhen Robert Pattinson talks, Twi-hards listen. And when a heartbroken Robert Pattinson asks Twi-hards to make sure his new flick does better at the box office than The Dark Knight Rises, they show up in droves and ensure that despite only playing in three theaters (in NY and LA), Cosmopolis grosses $72,300. Not too shabby at all! And possibly part of a master plan involving a highly orchestrated cheating scandal.

Call me a conspiracy theorist, but I'm not the only one who has had a sneaking suspicion that maybe just maaaybe Kristen Stewart didn't actually cheat on Rob with Rupert Sanders. Maybe the story was neatly crafted by the couple themselves or a snickering team of movie publicists, as a publicity stunt that could kill several birds with one big fat juicy stone ...

The Cosmopolis box office results -- which may have been a canary in the coal mine to test the potential for a huge Breaking Dawn: Part 2 opening -- isn't the only piece of evidence to support the scenario.

There's also the fact that the two seem to be getting out of multiple Twilight press events scot-free. Given how OVER it the two of them have seemed for some time, I could totally see Rob and Kristen having their agents try to finagle a way for them to get out of promoting the franchise they've undoubtedly become fatigued with over the past few years. By chalking their absence up to being "estranged" and "distressed" due to a split, they could easily back out of the usual circuit of junkets, Twilight conventions, and even award shows (cough like the VMAs) they never seemed really game for in the first place.

More from The Stir: Robert Pattinson Alleged Cheating Bombshell Changes Everything

And by no longer being known (publicly) as one-half of "that Twilight couple," both Rob and Kristen might have better shots at more versatile roles. Not to mention that a faux breakup throws the public "off the scent." If we assume they're dunzo, the couple automatically gets the privacy they've always seemed to crave!

Or ... perhaps she really did cheat, and they're really broken up, and Jon Stewart wasn't that off by assuming they've both been crying into empty pints of Chubby Hubby. Who knows? But if anyone's capable of an elaborately scripted break-up for bigger box office gains, it's two young movie stars and the forces initially responsible for their blockbuster success.

Do you think the RPattz/KStew split may be a stunt?

 

Image via JBAR/SplashNews

Filed Under: twilight, robert pattinson, kristen stewart

Comments

99
  • tnyangel
    --

    tnyangel

    August 20, 2012 at 11:56 AM

    Yeah, because that would make total sense if these guys were Speidi a few years ago and on their way OUT of the public eye. All these two had to do was keep going out in public to stay current and relevant and make money. I think it's a good conspiracy theory, but not plausible.


  • geeky...
    --

    geekychick

    August 20, 2012 at 12:08 PM

    I could see it being plausible because they are trying to break out of the twilight mold they have been cast into. So if they were already talking break up and wanted to do something that would distance themselves from the roles that they have been stuck in I could see them using this. They are trying to to not get stuck as a "type cast" and their careers ending in a few years when the craze dies down. It happens a lot in the movie industry were a star is born in a teen movie and then they recast and recast them in similar roles until they get to old and then we never see them again, most never break out of that first big role and are stuck in that genre until they fade away.


  • brand...
    --

    brandspanknnew

    August 20, 2012 at 12:12 PM

    I agree tnyangel. They were banking off of walking through their front doors together. They didn't have to go anywhere fancy, or even say anything and they got paid. Now, the lime light has kind of dimmed on her and she's lost her gig as Snow White for a sequel that will probably be huge. Good idea, but Kristen is losing too much money for this to just be a scam. He might actually be making more off of it. Hey! New theory! Robert Pattinson knew she was cheating so he SENT the camera's out to take the photos to highten his career and bring hers down! More plausible? I think so!


  • lckhaley
    -- Nonmember comment from

    lckhaley

    August 20, 2012 at 12:19 PM
    I think it would have been entirely possible that this whole thing is a PR stunt except for the fact that the "other man" has not only a wife, but children. Those children are always going to have this hanging over their heads. I say there is no way its not true.
  • save...
    -- Nonmember comment from

    save the date

    August 20, 2012 at 12:22 PM
    Hmmm why would you go to such efforts just for some media attention, doesn't seem plausible to me.
  • linzemae
    --

    linzemae

    August 20, 2012 at 12:30 PM
    I think the whole relationship was a stunt
  • Shandi80
    --

    Shandi80

    August 20, 2012 at 12:34 PM

    Linzemae, I think you're onto something.

    Seriously though, if this whole thing is true, I don't feel sorry for any of the adults involved, I feel worse for the kids. They did nothing wrong.


  • Sonny...
    -- Facebook comment from

    Sonny Nicole Morris

    August 20, 2012 at 12:41 PM
    well we will see, because if they are together, pics will be caught of them together, when ur famous, u cant hide forever.
  • Judy
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Judy

    August 20, 2012 at 12:43 PM
    Ya think? I have said this all along....since day 1. It made no sense for a couple who had been so private to go public with something like this!!!!
  • Victo...
    -- Facebook comment from

    Victoria Whitfield

    August 20, 2012 at 12:45 PM

    Um, no, i dont think so. They would be slated if that ever came out.


1-10 of 99 comments

To leave a comment, log in as a CafeMom member:

Log In

OR, use our non-member comment form: