Susan Sarandon has NEVER been known for holding back. She's always seemed unapologetic about everything from her politics to her personal life. Now, she's at it again -- getting herself in hot water with words. At the Hamptons Film Festival this past weekend, the veteran actress called the current Pope Benedict XVI a "Nazi" ... twice.
She was discussing having sent the pontiff a copy of Sister Helen Prejean's book, Dead Man Walking. And she clarified who exactly the recipient of the book was: "The last one [Pope John Paul II], not this Nazi one we have now." Apparently, when the interviewer expressed dismay at her description of the current pontiff, she repeated herself, and the audience chuckled (awkwardly?). Now, as you can imagine, the Catholic League is all up in arms about how "despicable" Sarandon is. But I think everyone needs to just simmah down for a minute.
Growing up as an American Jew, I learned how to make hamantaschen from a woman at my synagogue who was a Holocaust survivor, with a number tattooed on her arm. I read books like The Diary of Anne Frank and The Devil's Arithmetic and Night, feeling like if I had only been born a few decades earlier, I could have been one of the characters in those books. In short, I don't take the concept of what a "Nazi" is lightly at ALL. But, at the same time, I also understand that people now use the expression to label someone whose behavior they see as dictator-like, fascist. I usually cringe when the word is thrown around so lightly, but to me, it's not exactly on par with, say, a racial slur.
What's more, Susan was probably referring to the fact that the current Pope was a member of the Hitler Youth as a boy! It's something that's been confirmed and that most people are aware of. It wasn't as if he chose that fate -- it was required of all German boys his age at the time. Even though he deserted, he was affiliated with the Nazi regime as a child. That's a fact, and if Susan was simply repeating that fact, then oh well. It isn't exactly something that can be considered inflammatory. Overall, it's really no big deal -- something the Catholic Church should just let go in one ear and out the other. After all, I'm sure the Pope has bigger fish to fry.
How do you feel about Susan Sarandon's remark?
Image via David Shankbone/Flickr
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
How Tarot Cards Cured My Nightmares
Robin Gibbs Dies: 5 Greatest Bee Gees Songs (VIDEOS)
A User's Manual for My Daughter to Remember Me By
Stupid Reason #768 Kids Get Suspended From School (VIDEO)
Mom Confession: I Never Wanted to Be a Mother
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis
Vampire Sex and Vajazzling (it's...
Raising Digital Kids
Best Father-Daughter Dance Ever!

Comments (23)
It cracks me up that her remark was "harmless" while Hank Williams Jr's use of the word Hitler was "idiotic" (re: your article on that subject) despite the fact that one was made for a simple juxtaposition and the other was plain out name calling. Your level of hypocrisy still stuns me!
The sick freak protected child molesters. How about the Catholic League makes themselves useful and does something about the fact that a collar is more important to the greedy, selfish bastards leading the Church than the children they're supposed to protect and nurture to be good little babymakers and bible-readers?
Starrsitter, I believe Nicole just answered your question. Can you really not see the hypocrisy here? You can either believe the words Nazi and Hitler have no place in political or other social discourse, or you believe it's no big deal. Applying one or the other depending on whether you agree with/like the speaker = hypocrisy.
I believe her exact words were "ESPN Rocks for Cutting Hank Williams Jr. Loose". http://thestir.cafemom.com/sports/126833/espn_rocks_for_cutting_hank
I dont think it's a big deal that she said it. I do think it's hypocritical to "blast" 1 person for saying it and not another.
Ok I just read the Hank williams article and wow. Did the aothor forget that she wrote that? I mean it has only been a few days and now her opinion of free speach has drastically changed (or rather her opinion of people who use their right to free speach). Wait I think I know what it is, Hank was talking about Obama and that (as we all know) is blasphemous, while Sarandon is talking about the Pope which is completely ok because who's even catholic anymore? Does anyone even like the pope? I'm sure no one was offended by that at all. I think that (in my own opinion) both people had a right to speak their mind and in both cases people made a big fuss about (cuz thats what we do). I would like to know how the author justifies HER obvious bias.