Amid all the controversy surrounding this season's Dancing With the Stars casting choice of transgendered man Chaz Bono (and, to a much lesser degree, openly gay Carson Kressley), ABC has been alternately bashed for promoting a homosexual agenda while undermining traditional family values—and celebrated for their bravery, acceptance, and open-mindedness. GLAAD referred to Bono's inclusion as a "tremendous step forward," which sends "a strong message about the diversity within the LGBT community."
Meanwhile, DWTS executive producer Conrad Green recently stated that the show is unwilling to consider same-sex dancing partners. I don't know about you, but I'm a little confused over what message it is that they're really sending.
When asked if the show would consider same-gender dance partners, Green said,
We've discussed (such) pairings in the past. But the traditional role in ballroom (dancing) is for men to have a female partner, so that's what we'll do.
Well, isn't it also traditional for a man to marry a woman? I'm just saying, it seems like embracing one form of diversity but not another seems a little hypocritical. If you ask me, DWTS is just worried that a same-sex dance partner would be taking things too far in terms of what the conservative public is willing to watch. Sure, you can put a gay man on the show, but anyone who gets freaked out about the idea of homosexuality doesn't really have to confront it, because they're watching him dance with a woman.
In 2010, the Israeli version of Dancing With the Stars featured a same-sex couple, but senior DWTS producer Deena Katz says that even though same-sex dancing is common in more informal settings like clubs, professional dancing is meant to happen between a man and a woman.
This is not a social dancing show, it's a dancing competition. A man should dance with a woman, no matter what your sexual orientation, in ballroom. If I'd put Chaz with Mark (Ballas), for example, it would have looked like I was trying to make controversy. We're not setting people up on dates.
Right. There's never anything sexual about dancing. It's all about the artistry of the movement. Are you kidding me, here?
She added,
On our show, a man dances with a woman. There's a male part to the dance—he's the picture frame—and the woman is the picture.
I have no idea if I'd personally be interested in watching a same-sex couple on Dancing With the Stars or not—probably not, because I don't watch Dancing With the Stars, period—but I call bullshit on the notion that the show is avoiding these pairings because it would somehow besmirch the rules of formal dance. I think they've got a line they're not yet willing to cross, and it has less to do with the following the traditions of official ballroom competitions, and more to do with being scared of losing viewers.
What do you think about DWTS's stance against same-sex dancing?
Image via ABC


Ashley Is a Widow Who Stays Strong...
This Hot Dad Wants to Vacuum Your Rug
This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
















Comments 29
They let 2 men dance together several seasons back (just for one episode) - I think it was Donny Osmond and one of the pros. (If I remember correctly, Donny's female partner had the flu, so he danced with her pro husband). It looked totally stupid and was comical. If you watched the show you would know that the judges tend to be very critical of "traditional" ballroom moves and whatnot. How would you decided who played the male role in the dance and who played the female role? Because like it or not, most of the dances have a role for each sex. On top of that, the ONLY reason I can see that they would want to have a same gender couple would be so that they could stir up controversy, not so that they could give the viewing public what they want!
<3 Agreed. Quite hypocritical.
I think the liberal agenda is going further and further with this BS. Ok, so Chaz being on the show is "groundbreaking"....whatever. But the notion that NOW people are asking, "Well why can't they have men and men dance together?" The same reason why Taco Bell doesn't serve french fries. It's just not natural. Next they'll be asking why do they have to wear shoes? Why do the women HAVE to wear skirts? I mean, where does this shit stop?
AshleyThib you are an ignorant bigot.
Anyhoo, I think just like everything else in our world, the bigots are going to be disappointed because it will happen eventually. I'm glad it's being spoken about. ABC is being hypocritical and I predict that they will eventually, although probably not this season, show same-sex dancing couples.
Hold the phone AshleyThib - you support inter-racial relationships? Are you kidding me? You know that that was considered "not natural" not that long ago too.
@AshleyThib-I love that word "agenda". Anytime a group is trying to promote something that YOU don't agree with or understand or are freaked out by, it's an "AGENDA". But here's the thing: LGBT people don't have an "agenda", except that they want to be accepted for the human beings they are and treated with respect and dignity.
Now, that being said, same gender couples on DWTS? Never going to happen.
i see where you are coming from... but i see theirs too- traditional dance is a man and woman. there are many gay/lesbian dancers out there that perform in the man/woman tradition. while i have no problem if they allow carson to dance with marc ( i actually would love to see how they would mesh styles), they are a business and breaking from that tradition would cause them ratings loss. sad but true