It's Getting Harder & Harder for Jill Duggar to Deny She's Pregnant

Jill (Duggar) Dillard and IsraelWhoa baby? Rumors are swirling yet again that a certain Duggar might be with child. That's right, fans think a recent Instagram photo proves Jill (Duggar) Dillard is expecting her second baby, which might make you nod in agreement or scratch your head.

Advertisement

Here we go again.

Jill took to Instagram to share a sweet Duggar-Dillard mini reunion photo that has fans honing in on her waistline. So, do you think Jill is with child?

So happy to be back home for a visit! #familyandfriends www.dillardfamily.com

A photo posted by Jill Dillard (@jillmdillard) on

More from CafeMom: Derick Dillard Admits Jill Duggar Wasn't His 'First'

Maybe people think Jill is preggers because of how she's standing, or because she's using sister Josie to "cover up the bump"? Maybe it's the high-waisted skirt or Mom's choice in top?

Here's a pic of Jill wearing a similar outfit during her family's time in Central America a month ago. Still think she looks pregnant?

I love my fam! Checkout what we've been up to in Central America on our latest blog post at www.dillardfamily.com

A photo posted by Derick Dillard (@derickdillard) on

Hmm, it's so hard to say.

Maybe Jill is pregnant, and maybe she's not.

More from CafeMom: The Duggar Family Just Hinted at Another Courtship (Move Over, Jinger & Jeremy!)

No matter how excited Duggar fans might be at the idea of another baby, all of us should just chillax. Every expectant mother knows how stressful a pregnancy can be -- especially when you want to shout from the rooftops, but are trying your best to (patiently) wait until you reach the "safe zone." Assuming Jill is pregnant, let's not keep putting pressure on her to spill the beans sooner rather than later.

On the flip side, if Jill and Derick aren't having a baby, we just made Mom feel even worse about her body.

Let's just keep our thoughts to ourselves and move on with life, okay?

 

Image via derickdillard/Instagram

Read More >