When I first read the New York Times article about a new program being tried at dozens of schools to allow high school students to graduate two years earlier, I thought, what! Why rush things and push kids into the real world any earlier, especially when they are so behind the curve in reading and other basic skills.
But it started to make a lot more sense when I remembered my 11th grade alegbra class with Mrs. Gadarowski. No offense, Mrs. G. I know you really tried to help my mathematically-challenged self. But what a colossal waste of my time. I think I skated by with a D+, and was grateful for it.
I didn't know what I wanted to do for a living in 11th grade, but I did know one thing: It would be a job that did not involve numbers. Thank goodness for calculators on smart phones. My time would have been much better spent focused on the writing and language arts skills I was good at and that would eventually lead me to my future career.
That's the thinking behind the experimental program from the National Center on Education and the Economy, through a grant funded by Bill and Melinda Gates and modeled after similar programs in high-performing nations like Denmark, France and Finland.
In a nutshell:
Many students who enter community college need remedial courses their freshmen year to be able to stay in college, and many quit and drop out. This program attempts to eliminate that, to let high school students focus on the subjects and areas that they do well in and that will form the basis for their college preparatory work.
Those who take and fail the tests in 10th grade, called The Boards, would provide the option to enter community college early with a clear outline of their coursework. Sophomores who plan to attend selective colleges could still take the tests, and use them as a wake up call about the skills they need to master in high school before seeking to enroll in college.
Besides the obvious ones, I see lots of social benefits to this program. If someone told me I could graduate two years early and avoid the cliques, teasing, alienation, inferiority complexes, dejection, and just general miserableness of those years, I would have studied harder than I had in my entire life, even in algebra.
But that's just me, the high-school hater.
Would your teens do better in a program like this? Would you be sad that they were missing out on some high school milestones, like prom?
Related posts:
Mastectomy Photos Banned in Another Facebook Fail
Arrest in Etan Patz Missing Child Case (VIDEO)
A Chilling Past Life Experience Recounted
3 Red White & Blue Cocktails
Controversy: Gwen Stefani Bleaches Her Son's Hair
A '50 Shades of Grey' Shortcut for Busy Moms
Latest on Baby in Washing Machine Case (VIDEO)
Are People Who Eat Organic Judgy & Mean?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
Stephanie is a Surrogate Mom
Ashley Is a Widow Who Stays Strong...
I Named My Kid SpongeBob!
Emma Lives with Severe Food Allergies

Comments (5)
I think it really depends on the kid. But it does seem to be pushing them sort of "out of the nest" so to speak a bit soon, but that could just be because it's so new and different than all of my experience. Personally, I would have absolutely adored the opportunity- I was an excellent student, honors and gifted all the way, but I was ostracized, beaten up and tormented- academically I was a star, but socially I was at the very bottom of the totem pole, this kind of program likely would have helped and encouraged me tremendously. (PS- I was math challenged too, lol, and always thought why are they teaching me to do something my $4 calculator can do for me, that never made sense to me, lol)
I'd have jumped for it! If it could have gotten me out of the house (with abusive parents) two years sooner and if it could have helped me to avoid Junior year, heck yeah! But...at the same time, when you think of all of the drinking and stuff that goes on in college, I think I went at the time I was emotionally ready. I don't think I would have been able to handle it at the age of 16/17. Hard to say. I can see the positive and negative.
I, too, think it depends on the kids. And, if they did graduate 2 years earlier, they could have a prom as well...nothing says they can't! (Same with graduation).
In high school, I had all the credits and scores I needed to graduate after the 10th grade was completed. My final two years of high school consisted of showing up in the morning so I wouldn't be marked absent, taking "time-killing" courses like Advanced Typing and Office procedures and I got out every day at 11:00 am as part of a work study program. In essence, I worked full time AND went to school from the time I was 16 (10th grade)...I think it's a good idea if the individual situation is appropriate.
I feel it's rushing/pushing the kids too much......I would be more for letting them have a year or 2 off in the early years of college .......there's still so much development taking place particularly in the MIND!!!! I took 3 and a half years off and when I went back things just seemed to click better!!!!!
I think people need to stop finding ways to justify mediocrity in kids. HS is not brain surgery. Man up and finish it.