Follow The Stir

Say What!?

Vaccine Mishap Could Mean Your Kid's Not Protected After All

by Jeanne Sager on June 6, 2012 at 1:47 PM

vaccineI can't be the only mom who heaved a giant sigh of relief after her kid's 4-year check-up with the pediatrician. Aside from the yearly flu shot, we were looking at no more vaccines for a good long while, and she was safe from all sorts of nasty diseases. And then the CDC had to go ahead and release a vaccination report today that makes me want to run straight into my daughter's first grade classroom, throw a surgical mask on her, and run out with her in my arms.

Turns out pediatricians' offices aren't necessarily storing vaccines correctly. So ... there goes all my faith that showing up at every well child visit was enough to keep my kid safe. How about yours?

The problem is, they put out this scary report, but they don't really give parents solid answers.

More from The Stir: Vaccine-Friendly Parents Are the Best Thing for Unvaccinated Kids

So here's the skinny: when the Department of Health and Human Services' Office of the Inspector General reviewed 45 different healthcare offices back in 2010, they found as much as 76 percent of them were storing the vaccines at the wrong temperature -- either too high or too cold. Thirteen of those offices (about 29 percent) even had expired vaccines mixed in with the good stuff.

I should point out their sample size was pretty small. Just 45 offices. And the investigation focused specifically on clinicians in its special Vaccines for Children program, a project that provides funding to give low-income kids their shots for free. 

We're not talking an epidemic here. Buuuuuuuuuut, they're using the data to warn all healthcare offices about proper storage because of what it means for kids.

Exposure to inappropriate temperatures can reduce vaccine potency and efficacy, increasing the risk that children are not provided with maximum protection against preventable diseases.

It's the nebulous words they use that freak me out here. "Risk." "Reduce." "Maximum."

If they could just tell us "yup, your vaccinated kid is really unvaccinated," we'd know exactly what to do. But it's a whole bunch of maybes and possibilities. And parents don't even know how many offices are screwing up. Is this report indicative of what most of them do? Or is it a drop in the bucket?

If there was an easier way to tell than, say, waiting around until the kid comes down with a case of measles that I thought she'd been protected from, maybe this would stress me out less. My original pediatrician retired, so I can't even go check out his office fridge to see if he keeps the temperature in line.

You can ask your pediatrician to do what's called a titer, a blood test to determine if they have antibodies in their system. But that means another needle being poked into your kid's arm. And we don't even know that OUR kid's vaccine was one of the bad ones.

So we just get to wait. And wonder. And worry. Which is pretty much why we took the kid in to get a vaccine in the first place!

Are you worried that your vaccinated kid could be at risk?

 

Image via Andres Rueda/Flickr

Filed Under: kid health, vaccines

Comments

56
  • butte...
    --

    butterflyfreak

    June 6, 2012 at 2:04 PM

    In all things, there are risks. If you're going to freak out over all the maybes, you better just go find a bubble for you and your kid.


  • douxm...
    --

    douxmusique

    June 6, 2012 at 2:11 PM
    I guess you would never have known anything either way and been perfectly happy. So who cares. Honestly the only reason to even get vaccines is because "they" say you have to. Other than that these diseases should not he as scary as you say.
  • Marja...
    -- Facebook comment from

    Marja Panetta

    June 6, 2012 at 2:20 PM

    just be happy they didin't have any adverse reaction to the vaccine in the first place.. let alone one that could be "BAD"  ugh


  • Silly...
    --

    SillyJessi

    June 6, 2012 at 2:22 PM
    I don't know, I don't vaccinate because I don't believe they work anyways and it's not worth the risk of side effects to me. This sort of confirms that.
  • Lilit...
    --

    Lilith825

    June 6, 2012 at 2:37 PM

    ^^ Yeah - What they said!^^


  • jenne...
    --

    jennelise83

    June 6, 2012 at 4:00 PM

    I'm sorry.  But the vaccines are worse than the diseases they prevent?  Have any of you read a history book, or looked at pictures?  Polio, smallpox, Mumps, Scarlet Fever, German Measles...All diseases that have been controlled or eradicated by vaccine.  Read a book thats not by Jenny McCarthy.


  • Amber...
    -- Facebook comment from

    Amber Bratcher

    June 6, 2012 at 4:01 PM
    ^^Agree with previous posters^^ I've done my research and I don't think the side effects are worth it. I'd rather my kids have a healthy immune system that hasn't been attacked by poison from day one than risk them getting something serious that's caused by the vaccine.
  • Denise
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Denise

    June 6, 2012 at 4:02 PM
    Why would you not vaccinate? Have u ever seen a person who had polio as a child? Chicken Pox were the WORST- and why not protect your child from HPV...? They won't be kids forever and will certainly grow up and have relations. I love my children, and worry just as much as the next mother when it comes to issues such as this. But, if for 1 second, if he/she can be free from ANY illness- it's worth it. Especially knowing their are children out there, who's parents Decide not to vaccinate and allow their children to possibly harbor and spread disease.
  • Ronnie
    -- Nonmember comment from

    Ronnie

    June 6, 2012 at 4:28 PM
    I have done a lot of research on vaccinations, and I am absolutely certain most do not benefit the child, I am the mother of a 23 yr old an 11 year old and a five yr old and my oldest did receive the vaccinations because i was a young mother and had faith in my sons pediatrician my son had reactions to them, my second I was more cautious, always trust in your in-stink, do your own homework. My 5 yr old will be receiving his polo this year because I believe his immune system can handle it
  • Kathl...
    -- Facebook comment from

    Kathleen D Howard

    June 6, 2012 at 4:50 PM

    Most diseases are only controlled by vaccines. Smallpox is the only one that I have heard of that has been eradicated and that is because people have been vaccinated. Not vaccinating just means that we may never see an end to all these diseases. Some diseases exist in the environment  without human hosts. Tetanus is one of those. We lost a calf to it not too many years ago and when I was growing up we lost a horse. I had aunts that had Polio as children; they had to live with the damage it caused the rest of their lives. I had Chicken Pox as a child and the Shingles I had last year because of it was not fun (worse than the chicken pox) and this year a brother had Shingles at the same age I was when I had them.

    Most of the young adults now haven't seen many of these diseases. Some haven't been a problem for 50 years.

    Some of the vaccines don't protect 100%, but if these help to keep people from getting as sick, isn't that good? Maybe your child has a healthy immune system, but what about the child that has a weak immune system and because of that can't safely have the vaccine? They are more at risk of getting sick from an unvaccinated person.


1-10 of 56 comments

To leave a comment, log in as a CafeMom member:

Log In

OR, use our non-member comment form: