If you've ever been walking down a city street and hit by a kid on roller skates or on a scooter or even on a bike, then you know parents aren't watching their kids on riding toys. As a mom of two kids who often use riding toys AND sidewalks, I get how hard it can be, but I also don't think it's good for anyone when parents allow their kids to ride like crazy people. That is why I support the idea of ticketing kids (and parents) who use riding toys recklessly.
A 6-year-old boy who crashed his toy motorcycle into an SUV in Mexico was ticketed, hit with a $183 fine, and had his motorized toy confiscated. His mother is furious, but I think the police handled it well. What was a 6-year-old doing in the street driving a toy motorcycle?
Kids are seriously dangerous on riding toys. My 3-year-old son rides over my foot at least four times a day on his toy ATV and that is just in our tiny house. Outside, he would be a menace.
So when he does go outside, I keep him confined. I look out for people. I stand next to him and make sure he stops at every street. I don't let him drive recklessly or hit cars or people and I certainly wouldn't do so if his car had a motor. Those toys are great, but the reason they cost so much is because they're meant for people with private estates. They aren't meant for people to drive them in the street.
That is just plain irresponsible. This mom may want us to feel bad for her, but instead, I feel scared for her child. Why was he driving his toy motorcycle in the street? He is 6!
The fact is, those riding toys are dangerous. They can go fast and they can hurt others (including children). It's our job as parents to keep kids riding them in check. If we can't do that, then sure, the police can ticket them.
I find this neither outrageous or weird. The kid was driving recklessly and he got a ticket. This is exactly what should have happened.
Have you ever seen a kid riding one of these recklessly?
A Dad's Perspective on Playdates
Bagged Salad Recall Sparks New Fears
Help Dying 4-Year-Old Fulfill His Bucket List (VIDEO)
Melissa McCarthy & Sandra Bullock's Buddy Cop Movie
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
How Tarot Cards Cured My Nightmares
Robin Gibbs Dies: 5 Greatest Bee Gees Songs (VIDEOS)
A User's Manual for My Daughter to Remember Me By
Stupid Reason #768 Kids Get Suspended From School (VIDEO)
Mom Confession: I Never Wanted to Be a Mother
Backstage at Mamma Mia! with Irene Bunis
Vampire Sex and Vajazzling (it's...
Raising Digital Kids
Best Father-Daughter Dance Ever!

Comments (11)
The parents should have received the citation for destruction of property for any damage caused by the toy, not the little boy. Still, it's a step in the right direction. If the parents allow their child to use these toys unsupervised, they deserve any financial repercussions of their actions.
Actually, to amend what I said, that should apply to any toys that could potentially inflict damage on people who are not the user. Remember those ridiculous "Heely" shoes that kids would use in stores, malls, etc even if there were "No rollerblade" rules in place?
the 6 year old was on a gas powered motorcycle that is supposed to be registered. It is the parents who are at fault for giving that to a 6 year old who should not have been on that to begin with its not a toy when its run on gas.
Gas powered movable items are not toys at all. If it was just a foot powered toy then there is no way the child should be fined for foot power that is wrong. the gas power is totally different story.
there is a kid nearby my home that has driven one of those damn bikes infront of my car when I'm passing his house... the same little shit took a swing at my car with a skateboard. Several years ago, I almost ran over some kid riding a mini motorcycle behind my car because I couldn't see him as I was backing out. The person who thoght of those damn things should be shot.
I agree with the others. Fine the parents, not the child.
That's ridiculous to ticket a child. But by all means, ticket the parents. They are the one's who are responsible.
Ticket the parents not the child.
Really??? ticket a 6 year old. Wtf??? Sure make the parents pay for the damage, but give the kid a ticket?? I am not sure this story is even right, how is it possible to ticket a child for something when you can't sue a child or a child can't legally sign a contract? That doesn't make sense to me.