What is it with the world today? It seems like every time I turn around, someone (or something) is trying to force my little girl to be a much bigger girl far before she is ready. But this latest trend toward little girl lingerie, modeled by little girls in spreads that look like child porn, is really so far across the line, it's comical.
Who on Earth thought this was OK?
The photos are ads for a new line of “loungerie” (that’s lingerie plus loungewear) for girls as young as 3 months. The line is called Jours Après Lunes, and claims to be the first designer brand of underwear/lingerie for children and teenagers.
But does this seem like something you would want your daughter to be photographed wearing? See below:

How about this:

Or this:

I almost felt weird putting these photos up here, to be honest. Sure, the French might call me a prude, but you know what? So what? Little girls shouldn't be styled up like grown-ups, showing this much skin. It's not good for their sense of self worth and it's not good for a culture to fetishize youth in such a way.
The pieces themselves are fine. Off the girls, they are simply nice pieces of age-appropriate lingerie. And some tweens probably do need training bras and such, so fine. But why the styling? Were the big hair and makeup needed, too?
Children are children for 10 minutes, it seems. So why do we want to rush them through it? Sure, it's adorable when our kids dress up and they look adorable and all is age-appropriate. But these are not. Period.
It's hard to even tell these girls are girls at all. Had I seen them in another context, I may have assumed they were adults. And that is where it crosses the line. These aren't innocent kids playing dress-up. These are highly styled girls being posed provocatively to appeal to adults.
There's a huge difference.
Do you think these are wrong?
Images via Jours Après Lunes


Kim and Kanye's Baby Name Predictions!
Moms Love Birthday Parties, Too!
Father Knows Best - Happy Father's Day!
Are Cheaters Entitled to Privacy? - A...

















Comments 127
Those don't look any worse than the training bras and panties found at any clothing store..
I think the items themselves are ok, but the suggestive posing is WAY inappropriate. If the little girls want to have "grown up" items, whatever. But the models need to be mannequins, not children.
Hell yes this is wrong. Underwear are for under your clothes. How are we suppossed to teach our little girls that their bodies are theirs and shouldn't be touched and then toss them in clothes like this and let them be photographed. I remember when people thought the Anne Geddes photos were inappropriate and now we're tossing toddlers into lingere and pretending it's cute. This is sick. Why can't kids be kids anymore? No wonder there are so many young teens getting pregnant-parents aren't teaching their little girs that it's OK to be little girls for a while. I can't believe they are actually allowed to use this as advertising!
@sandhmom2- Teaching children about sex in elementary school doesn't necessarily mean that the teachers and other administrators will be forcing kids to see friendships between same sex ppl as gay. It sounds to me as if you are a bit of a homophobe...
I must be the only person that's heard of Huggy Bear, the Bear who goes to schools and does presentations about good and bad touches. If we can teach our kids as young as kindergarten about that, why can't LGBT have equal time?
But, I digress... the photographs portraying young girls as lingerie models sickens me. Anyone else remember Jon Benet Ramsey? There are girls all over America being flaunted about in fashion and makeup with elaborate hairdos. I guess that's one reason why the rate of child molestation, kidnapping, rape etc is so high here.
I think the outfits are cute but I agree, stop trying to make them into little adults. Especially stop sexualizing them. Their kids, let them be KIDS.
These girls don't even have breasts that need support yet, so why would they need a bra of any sort? Lingerie's INTENT is to be provocative. You don't put little girls in it and take pictures of their butts in see-through panties...
My daughters "lounge" in cotton panties and tank tops or t-shirts. Sometimes even--gasp!--PAJAMAS. All comfortable, cute, and non-disgusting.
No one is forcing you to BUY these for your little girl. If you don't like cute undies for your kids, then don't buy them.
This is the grosses thing i have ever seen for a child. A Mother who lets her Daughter pose like this is a low life in my eyes. There are to many perverts in this world and to have a little girl Pose half nude in underwear that are meant for adults is ridiculous.
i don't agree with it at all! my daughter is 8 and i taught her not to show nothing. i wouldn't let her wear anything that looked like that!
I almost just vomited... child porn, omfg. WHAT THE FUCK IS WRONG WITH THIS WORLD?!