Where do you rank child molesters? Dead last on people you'd ever cross the road to help out, right? Keep that in mind as you read this story.
A convicted child rapist who is facing additional charges for child sex abuse has been set free by the Utah courts because of a loophole in the law. Lonnie Hyrum Johnson has been deemed incompetent to stand trial by doctors, so the police can't hold him any longer. So, he's competent enough to do unspeakable things to a kid (he was convicted of at least one charge, after all), but he can't be forced to pay for that? WTF Utah!
The bizarre case has frustrated prosecutors, who have argued that Johnson is a risk to the public if he's released . . . all to no avail. The legal loophole describes a person who presents a danger to the public as someone who carries the "risk of causing “serious bodily injury,” which is defined in terms of death, extreme physical pain, obvious disfigurement and “protracted loss or impairment ... of a bodily member, organ or mental faculty.” Sex crimes aren't listed, so Johnson goes free to hang out around kids and put them in danger.
Which brings up the second bizarre bit of this awful situation. The frustrated county attorney announced, "I feel there’s been enough coverage that I suspect people will have their eye on him." So he's putting that on the public now? They now have the burden on their shoulders of policing where the cops can't. They have to watch out for a guy who is a clear risk to children, and carry the burden of guilt if something happens to one of their own because they can't watch 24/7.
And those are the sane people. Read by someone crazy enough and "have their eye on him" becomes code for "take CARE of him" pretty quickly. With the way most of us think of child molesters, it's not unfathomable. It would be WRONG, of course, but there's a storied history of people in America branded heroes for taking justice into their own hands and taking out a child molester.
But I digress. It's sad that a community has to take on the mantle of protecting kids from a criminal and deviant because the law won't do it. Thank goodness the prosecutor is right, and there are people who will!
Is this law wrong? Should this guy be in prison?
Image via stevendepolo/Flickr
This Hot Dad Wants to Vacuum Your Rug
This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
Comments 25
Doesn't suprise me that this comes out of Utah.
Seriously though. This guy deserves to be in prison
What happened to the sanctity of life do our children not matter to the courts that much anymore.
How do loopholes like that get created any way? That shouldn't even be possible.
Is not "extreme physical pain" part of what a molested child is left with for a lifetime? In Texas this week a convicted child molester was set to be rearrested for yet another crime against children, he'd already been to the pen, released, violated his probation, etc, etc, but instead faked his own death by killing someone, putting them in the trunk of his car and setting it on fire. Didn't work because he had already tried this once. So if that isn't a danger to the public, I don't know what is. Not only was he a continuing danger to children, but to adults as well as he was willing to kill to try and save his own worthless hide. Insane or not, my belief is that child molesters should be locked away for life. They do not rehabilitate, even castration has proved to be ineffective in stopping them. There is no place in society for them.
impairment of organs? what happens to those poor little girls uterus or anus when this man enters where it shouldn't? hpv is often contracted from a seemingly clean person. they need to to amend this immediately to include any harm to children. i hate that a lawyer backed this man up, i want the lawyer's name and address to send him letter's about what a piece of scum he his for bringing this up in court.
If he is not competent to stand trial, then why is he not hospitalized in a place for criminally insane until he is competent.