In the US it seems like talking about motherhood almost always inevitably leads to a cacophony of platitudes and outright lies. We moms say that these are the "best" years of our lives and that our children are our top priorities. We almost always say that nothing is more important than motherhood. And for the vast majority of us, that may be true.
But that is not true for everyone. So when someone like writer Rahna Reiko Rizzuto comes along with the piece she wrote for Salon this week, we should stand up and take notice. To be honest, it's one of the most important pieces on motherhood I have read in a long time.
Not because I think she was right or even because I necessarily agree with her view of motherhood. No, I think it's important because it's brave. We need mothers to be able to be honest and real and say the things they know everyone will vilify them for thinking.
In the piece, Rizzuto talks about leaving her children to go to Japan for six months to work. In that time, her marriage falls apart and she and her husband must decide how to split custody, which for her becomes obvious:
It raised a little issue for me that I have neglected to mention: I never wanted to be a mother.
She goes on to say that her husband had really wanted to be the parent and so she gives up custody to him. She moves down the street and she parents the only way she can -- from a distance. The children come to see her and she is very involved in their lives, but Donna Reed, she is not.
The commenters (predictably) have had a field day, calling her everything from selfish to evil to narcissistic and beyond. I say she is something else: ridiculously, unequivocally brave.
Guess what? Not all moms feel exactly the same way about motherhood. We aren't all handed some identical set of emotions and feelings and ways to deal with our children, and quite frankly, some of us are better at certain aspects than others. Some men are better suited for the role of primary parent. Is that really so wrong? Rizzuto says:
I had to leave my children to find them. In my part-time motherhood, I get concentrated blocks of time when I can be that 1950s mother we idealize who was waiting in an apron with fresh cookies when we got off the school bus and wasn't too busy for anything we needed until we went to bed. I go to every parent-teacher conference; I am there for performances and baseball games. My former husband is there too.
In this society, we are so quick to call a woman selfish for wanting a space of her own, for pursuing her own desires, and for not always choosing her children first. We have exalted mothers as these bastions of selflessness and we hold them to these standards that would make even Mother Teresa quake beneath her robes. Mothers must never have any desire for themselves, they must never (gasp!) choose their own needs over their child's.
I call BS. I call BS because mothers are people, too. We are not all saints and we all have different ways of expressing ourselves, and that individuality is accepted in almost every other arena BUT motherhood. Was Rizzuto selfish? Maybe. A little. But so what? Why is "selfish" such a bad thing?
As she says:
My problem was not with my children, but with how we think about motherhood. About how a male full-time caretaker is a "saint," and how a female full-time caretaker is a "mother." It is an equation we do not question; in fact we insist on it. And we punish the very idea that there are other ways to be a mother.
I would argue that being overly selfless is its own hell, too. Life is short and love matters, but so do we. Why is it so wrong to say it? In the end, Rizzuto is a mother to her children in the best way she can be. She doesn't abandon them or walk out the door. She just acknowledges her weaknesses and gives them what she is able. That isn't selfish. That is strength. That is what I would like to model for my children. Strength and courage are more important that "selflessness" any day.
Do you think she was selfish? Do you think moms shouldn't be selfish?
Image via emmamccleary/Flickr


This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
This Hot Dad Cooks AND Does the Dishes
Kanye West is Gay?!
















Comments 42
The best kind of mother is the one who does what is right for her children. In her situation she made the right decision for HER children because they are better off with their father. It might not be right in our eyes, but it was right for this situation. She hasn't abused her children or failed to see that their needs are being met. This in itself makes her a million times better than hundreds of thousands of moms in the world.
I rather her give up her children to their father then be like thousands of mothers and/or fathers who try to get rid of their kids by killing them. In that case---you people on her back would be whining saying 'why didn't she give her kids to someone who wanted them?'...just proves most people are hypocrites.
i agree with eric. if she didn't want children then why did she marry someone who did? i don't think she's brave. she shouldn't have had children if she wanted to live her life for herself. i understand having a life of your own. however she abandoned her children. it's unfair for them to not have their mother around all the time because she wants her own life.
for all you people saying that leaving her children for six months for her jobs selfish and abandoning them i ask you is my husband abandoning us and acting selfish when he deploys for his career in The Navy??? wot about all our other service members??? he chose to marry and have children.... why is there a double standard???
Guess what - we live in America - we do all have a choice (at least for now) - to become a mother. Or not. We have MANY forms of birth control, abortion, and adoption. Yes, I'm pro-choice because I think it matters less what happens to a fetus than a child. Once you have it, it is YOUR responsibility. It sounds like her hubby was the one who wanted kids more -thats fine - why didnt she make that more clear to him BEFORE the kids? I have no problem with the man being the primary caregiver, but that needs to be decided early on. getting pregnant is waaaay too easy for some. And way too hard for others unfortunately.
To me the question of being selfish or not is not as important as the obvious question of why did she get pregnant (more than once) if she "never really wanted to be a mother"? This doesn't make sense to me.
WHY is it OK for a man to leave his children for 6 months at a time? WHY is it ok for a father to only see his child on wknds & holidays? Her children understand that they have 2 parents who are there for them- for parent teacher conferances, and baseball games and even to bake cookies! these are things i NEVER got from my mother, a single mother, mind you. They have a FATHER as a primary care giver and somehow we cant wrap our heads around that! Had this divorce ended in primary custody going to her, and her husaband had been the one part-time parenting, NO ONE would have blinked an eyelash.
Call it selfish if you want- but her kids have 2 parents who love them, and who are happy individuals in their own right. I'm sure that's more than many 2 parent homes can claim