Diagnoses of whooping cough started cropping up in California a few weeks ago. Over 2,100 cases of whooping cough have been confirmed in the state -- more than four times as many as last year -- killing seven babies. An epidemic has been declared, vaccinations are being strongly urged, and now more than 6,900 whooping cough cases are being reported in other states throughout the U.S.
Is whooping cough the next nationwide epidemic? And what about vaccinations? Do non-vaccinations play a part in making this the largest whooping cough outbreak since 1958?
According to an article in Mother Jones:
"Officials are still investigating the causes of the outbreak, but some have already suggested that the anti-vaccine movement could be at least partly to blame."
In an ABC News story, Dr. Blaise Congeni from Ohio’s Akron Children's Hospital said:
"California is the epicenter of vaccine refusal." Even though California requires that children be vaccinated from whooping cough before they attend school, Congeni says, "the requirement is waived if parents file a 'personal belief exemption' (PBE), which need not be based on religion or medical necessity."
Dr. Anatoly Belilovsky, New York board-certified pediatrician and expert in early diagnosis and a proponent for immunizations, is here with us today with some advice and suggestions about how to protect your children from this highly contagious and potentially fatal upper respiratory disease, also known as pertussis.
Who is most at risk with the current epidemic of whooping cough?
Pre-vaccinated children under six months old are the most vulnerable to the disease because of both age (the younger the child, the higher the mortality and the chance of cerebral hemorrhage) and uncompleted (or not yet begun) primary vaccine series. The vaccine for whooping cough is a series of three shots, culminating when the child is around six months old.
Of course, anyone who has not been vaccinated against the disease is very much at risk. Even adults who were vaccinated as children but have not received boosters and are over the age of 65 are at a heightened risk. This is because the immunity given by the vaccination actually fades over time.
New moms and pregnant women are being told to get vaccinated to help protect their babies. If we already got a whooping cough shot when we were young, why should we get one again?
Antibody levels fade over time. What we think of as whooping cough epidemics -- ten or so reported cases -- are actually just the tip of the iceberg. We have always known that in any whooping cough epidemic, there are a number of confirmed cases -- those with easily-diagnosed classic presentation and positive labs -- but also a huge up tick in the number of people with chronic cough but nothing else. There is good evidence that all of these people with the chronic cough actually have whooping cough, although they go undiagnosed because, due to some lasting immunity from their childhood vaccinations, they present with such relatively mild symptoms.
The good news for those people is that their infection does act as a booster shot against future infections, for five to ten years -- at the cost, however, of three months of severe, unrelenting, largely untreatable cough for the sufferer, and the danger of severe disease for at-risk contacts. Adult boosters certainly prevent these episodes fairly well, but more importantly, they decrease the hazard of transmission via adults to infants. For that reason, new moms AND their partners should be sure to get booster shots, as should anyone who is in contact with children and babies.
What are the early signs of whooping cough?
Whooping cough is a really bizarre disease. The bacteria that causes it is very highly contagious, but it does not multiply in large numbers in the lungs, and it does not invade deep into the body. It causes the cough by depositing a long-acting toxin in the lining of the bronchi. The initial presentation of pertussis is a week of mild coughing. This is called the "catarrhal" phase. It is impossible to diagnose pertussis during this time with any degree of reliability and in a timely manner, but this time is the only chance to abort the infection with antibiotics. When the paroxysmal phase starts and the diagnosis is possible, it is too late to treat (though antibiotics will reduce time of contagiousness).
What steps can parents take to protect their kids from whooping cough (beyond immunizations, of course)?
It is my practice to start antibiotics in potentially exposed individuals with even mild coughs, especially if they are at high risk for complications. (Known exposed contacts are given antibiotics even when asymptomatic).
It is critical that parents get vaccinated for whooping cough, even if they had the shots as children. Otherwise, they could get a mild case of the disease and, without even knowing that they have it, transmit it to their children. Most parents know that they must have their children vaccinated, but not all parents think to get themselves vaccinated as well.
Clearly, the usual airborne infection precautions -- stay out of crowds, limit visits to immediate family, separate from symptomatic family members, hand washing and not sharing personal items -- apply as well.
This outbreak emphasizes the importance of vaccines. Whooping cough is a potentially fatal, yet entirely preventable disease as long as children and adults are kept current with vaccines.
What about parents who choose not to vaccinate?
Many parents who choose not to vaccinate their children may believe that there are alternative strategies to reduce risks -- breastfeeding, organic or raw/live food, vitamins to boost the immune system, etc. And in fact, these efforts might yield some fractional, incremental reduction in risk (particularly with breast feeding). But to say that "healthy living" cuts the risk of death or permanent injury by, say, ten times, does not change the fact that universal vaccination cuts the risk by two or three orders of magnitude (by 100 to 1,000 times).
The reason that I recommend vaccinations is there really are no other reliable methods of preventing extremely contagious diseases like whooping cough.
Whether you vaccinate or don't vaccinate, are you concerned about whooping cough?
Image via lu_lu/Flickr
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
How Tarot Cards Cured My Nightmares
Robin Gibbs Dies: 5 Greatest Bee Gees Songs (VIDEOS)
A User's Manual for My Daughter to Remember Me By
Stupid Reason #768 Kids Get Suspended From School (VIDEO)
Mom Confession: I Never Wanted to Be a Mother
Why '50 Shades of Grey' Is a Must-Buy for Every Guy
'What to Expect When You're Expecting' Review (VIDEO)
10 Things a Husband Should Never Say to His Wife
11 Beautifully Painted Pregnant Bellies (PHOTOS)
Raising Digital Kids
Best Father-Daughter Dance Ever!
How Do Airplanes Stay in the Sky? -...
Twilight's Disappointing Sex Scene

Comments (40)
yup, i truly believe that the non-vaxing movement has caused this.
Yeah it HAS to do with th non-vaxers and could NEVER be that vaccines are no where near as effective as they claim to be. *eye-roll*
Of course I am concerned. I have an almost 2 month old who is waiting to be vaxed, and I know an actul (vaxed) infant who died from it a few years back. ANY disease is a concern whether vaxed or not. Even if vaccines are as effective as they claim, there is no guarantee (period) that YOUR child will reap the benefits of 'immunization'. 80% effective means 20% chance you aren't protected.
I'm always worried about my children but the chances of them being hurt by the vaccine are higher than the chances of them being permanently injured by pertussis. I'll take my chances. My job is to protect my children not other parents' children.
As far as "non-vaxing" goes, I have a couple observations.
1) As long as the medical / "public health" community fails to provide honest, comprehensive information for concerned parents, they cannot expect full compliance with their guidelines in a free country. Based on my research, it is a lot more important to get kids the whooping cough vaccine than the MMR vaccine, and the MMR is more dangerous than the whooping cough vaccine. Yet with only a vague understanding that "some" vaccines carry "some" dangers, many parents will either opt out or delay all of them. I don't blame the parents; I blame the public officials who think we are too stupid or careless to make our own decisions.
2) Until more adults start getting the vaccinations recommended for them, it is unfair to demand that little babies bear all of this burden. If you are up-to-date on all of your vaccinations and boosters, you might have room to complain about your neighbor's infant being behind on some of his. Otherwise, clam it.
Yes It concerns me and yes I vaccinate.
Quoting 'It is critical that parents get vaccinated for whooping cough, even if they had the shots as children. Otherwise, they could get a mild case of the disease"
My completely unbiased question is... If they are suggesting people who have already been vaccinated can still get this and pass it on and therefore must be revaccinated, how is this the fault of nonvaxers? Sounds like vaccinations don't work in the first place. Even if EVERYONE had been vaccinated they would still be suggesting revaccination.
Gina, do your research. If you knew anything about polio then you'd know that there hasn't been a case of WILD polio since the 70s. All recorded cases of polio have been linked to vaccines. Get your head out of your ass.
i am concernced about wooping cough just as much as any other of the hundreds of diseases that my child may or may not get. It's scary thinking that my child could get this disease, but my child is going to be exposed to all kinds of diseases and I can't spend all of their life worrying about a disease that they could get. I chose to vax with my first child, but with my second child (he's 6 weeks) I am choosing to vax on a different schedule because my first has autism. I know that there is no "proof" that vaccines caused my child to have autism but there is no proof to what did cause it, and unlike whooping cough, there is no cure or medicine that can help my child. I am willing to take that risk knowing the consequences. You can still get whooping cough even after being fully vaccinated, so it's wrong to blame only the people that chose not to vaccinate. When really nobody should be blamed. Contracting a disease is a part of life and even when it is preventable, can't be prevented 100% of the time. If you think of it in another way, wearing a seat belt helps prevent many injuries in a car crash, but just because you are wearing one doesn't guarantee that you won't get hurt. The fact is that the disease will always be around. People are forgetting that not every part of the world has access to vaccines and choosing to vax or not isn't an option.