Paris Hilton's Ridiculous Wardrobe Malfunction Wasn't an Accident (PHOTO)

paris hiltonIt's been a while since we heard from Paris Hilton, so naturally, a wardrobe malfunction was in order. On Saturday, at Hilton's 33rd birthday in Los Angeles, the former Famous for Being Famous Queen flashed pretty much her entire bottom half, which, oopsie, doesn't appear to have underwear on.

This poor girl! This just keeps on happening to her! Poor thing must be so embarrassed!

I'm kidding. Check her out. Do she and her strategic tan lines look embarrassed?

paris hilton

Ew, dude. If you ask me, this was totally done on purpose. I mean, who wears a dress with a slit like that and no, or very little, underwear underneath? I'm not buying this one as an accident for a nanosecond.

And for those of you who think little ol' Paris may have just been the unfortunate victim of a run-away up-to-the-crotch slit incident, check out this video:

No way, Paris. Not buyin' it. You totally knew what you were doing here, as no woman would ever go underwearless in a dress like that. And hey, look! It's working! I'm writing all about it! Paris 1; blogger 0.

Do you think Paris Hilton's wardrobe malfunction was done on purpose or an accident?

 

Image via Splash News

wardrobe malfunctions

19 Comments

To add a comment, please log in with

Use Your CafeMom Profile

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Comment As a Guest

Guest comments are moderated and will not appear immediately.

nonmember avatar Jesse

Not that she is a bastion of modesty, but it does look that the dress has a built-in leotard, and that leotard was giving her a front wedgie (ouch). So maybe her lady parts are desensitized from all the waxing and she didn't even feel that the leotard had moved.

BPayne09 BPayne09

If you look close you can see the dress has like a built in leotard underneath. She's showing a lot of skin but no more than a swimsuit would. I guess you could see more from the front but still.

BGarcel BGarcel

Technically, it wasn't an accident. But it's not scandalous at all because there is a leotard

nonmember avatar RICK

NUM NUM

Barbara Elizabeth Brown Johnson

I must confess that even after enlarging the photos and really staring closely, I can find no leotard as some mentioned in the comments.

But, with Paris, nothing risque is by accident. What else does she have to keep her in the spotlight?

nonmember avatar elsa

"Wardrobe malfunction" = publicity stunt. Every time.

nonmember avatar Susan

The leotard is there, you can see the fabric follows the curve of her stomach. It's the curved fabric about 4" above the tan line.

nonmember avatar sigh

Why are people saying they can't see a leotard? It lays flat against her stomach and goes down to the lower right of the picture, towards her leg. Duh.

nonmember avatar Jason b

She's good at being a slut! Look at that bald pretty pussy

1-10 of 19 comments 12 Last