Jennifer Lawrence Wants You to See Her Nipples (VIDEO)

Style Savvy 13

Jennifer Lawrence braless on 'Rolling Stone' CoverThere are two types of magazine covers that ALWAYS always always catch my eye. One, the obvious preggers cover. You know, the Demi Moore/Jessica Simpson/big time A-listers without clothes showing off their baby-filled stomach sorta thing. And two, the braless cover. Jennifer Lawrence, my biggest Hollywood crush EVAH (next to Justin Timberlake) and star of The Hunger Games, opted for numero dos on the April cover of Rolling Stone.

It's not that I don't think she looks hot. Hell, I'd contemplate giving up Diet Coke for a month to A) have her killer bod and B) rock that perfectly placed "messy" hair look. But I dunno, the braless thing just so isn't my shtick. Exposed nipples? DEFINITELY not.

We're not in the 1970s anymore, sweetheart.

Personally, I've got decent sized jugs. Yup, I just wrote that down for the whole world to read. Maybe my anti-braless stance is because of my larger bust size. I just know that if you've got some extra lovin' up top, it doesn't look as good without a little extra support. I don't know about you, but I feel weird without it!

It's not all about support, though. Hello -- let's talk shape. The overall look of a gorge dress or blouse could be totally ruined if your highbeams are pointing in the wrong direction. Yeah yeah, I understand that some women just "wanna feel free" and are so not down with being restricted because "culture thinks it's what they should do." I dunno. I've never been on top of that soap box and I just never will be.

So yeah. It's true. In fact, there's no disputing it. J. Lawr, you look beautiful and all sorts of sexy without the bra. Will I be leaving the house without my boulder holder anytime soon? Yeah, not so much.

Watch some footage from her Rolling Stone shoot, here:

What do you think about going braless? 

 

Image via Rolling Stone

body, beauty, hunger games

13 Comments

To add a comment, please log in with

Use Your CafeMom Profile

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Join CafeMom or Log in to your CafeMom account. CafeMom members can keep track of their comments.

Comment As a Guest

Guest comments are moderated and will not appear immediately.

fraoch fraoch

Maybe I'm seeing things, but I totally see a bra on her. Are you talking about another cover that's not here?

kebrowni kebrowni

I did it a ton before I got pregnant and started breastfeeding, but then I also never wore a thin white shirt; I only wore shirts where you couldn't really tell (I was a small 34B). I also wore pasties a lot because no matter how well a bra would fit, I always ended up with small rolls on my back and it just grossed me out. I'd go braless now if I wasn't breastfeeding and my boobs weren't so misshapen.

mompam mompam

I don't see nipples either. Maybe I need to see the actual magazine. I used to go braless in my younger years, but never with a tight shirt

lovin... lovinallofthem

ive had big jugs since age 11 , so no, i never go without.  and i ONLY take it off as i jump into bed.  i liked J.Lawr's cover, not TOO MUCH like a MAX. mag cover... which i guess she'll be doing soon now.. cuz Rolling Stone is a starter mag..... ( O-o )

_brownie _brownie

Welp, at some point celebs are even thirsty for attention and do things like this to get it.  If I did go bra-less, my top wasn't revealing. There was a time (younger and before pregnancy) my breast were big but perky.  Certain gowns and tops wouldn't allow a bra and I didn't need to wear it.


 

nonmember avatar TandemFrost

I just came on here to verify that I wasn't seeing things. That stuff bothers me when I'm not sure. But, yeah, looks good to me. I'm a guy, obviously. Also, she has kind of small boobs, so... maybe she's not worried.

nonmember avatar Jenfan56

I was seeing things two I was like wait is she without a bra? Or wtf I think she still looks GORGEOUS AND BEAUTIFUL no Mather what! & she didn't do this for attention she's amazing & she doesn't have small boobs @_brownie! Gosh

nonmember avatar Kristie Council

Really!? How pathetic! God forbid someone see us without a bra! I almost forgot for a moment that I am supposed to be totally ashamed of my beautiful natural large breasts that in no way conform to Hollywood tiny pert breasts.

Brian Rossiter

It's clearly a retro shoot, so the braless look makes sense.

nonmember avatar Tom S

Let's see more truthful bralessness. Why shouldn't a woman go topless? They want equality with men. So, show it - and, publishers, let it be shown.

1-10 of 13 comments 12 Last