Britney Spears and Kim Kardashian may have different skill sets (one's a singer and one's a ... TV personality? What are we calling Kim these days, even?), but they both know what to do to get attention: cleavage. And I mean clah HEE, veh hedge. The famous pair joined up at Clive Davis' Grammy pre-party earlier this week and evidently rocked out with their boobs out. Britney in a plunging black Herve Leger dress and Kim in an even more plunging slash lifting Antonio Berardi navy gown, the two ladies were a sight to boob hold. Behold!
They couldn't have looked any hooter hotter even if they tried. And I know what you're thinking: But come on, Britney doesn't look that awesome. And while I agree, I think we have to cut her some slack here. No matter how awful we think Kim "Ket's Ket a Kivorce" Kardashian is, she's still one beautiful woman. Stunning. Anyone standing next to her will look horrendous.
And if you happen to be photographed next to the ex Mrs. Humphries after you've had 10 years of constant pressure to be famous/better/prettier, had two kids, had two breakdowns that involved terrible hairstyles and umbrellas, not to mention an ill-advised fling with a nasty paparazzo, you'd look pretty awful standing next to Kim, too.
HOWEVER. I know what you're saying. Poor Britney. I mean, she looks great by any other standard, but put her side by side with this woman, and ouch. Ouch-a-roos. This is the difference, looks-wise, between peaking as a young star, and peaking when you’re older. Kim hasn’t burnt out yet, Britney did years ago. And it shows.
Do you think Kim would lend Britney her hairstylist, or is he tied up in her basement somewhere, contractually obliged to only style the K krew? It's just that Britney is/was so HOT. And now she's starting to resemble Ke$ha in the worst way possible. Perhaps some Kardashian beauty team members would be able to fix her up a bit. As long as they went easy with the eyeliner, I think Brit could benefit from a Kardash makeover. At least she'd look ... cleaner. Butt padding would be optional, of course. Showering would not be.
What do you think of Britney and Kim's looks?
Photo via Larry Busacca/Getty
Do Working Moms Have It Easy?
Your Morning Coffee Could Save Your Life
Join the Fight Against Toxic Kids' Products
8 Summery Sweet Popsicles You Can Make at Home
Guy Gets Chest Waxed on National TV (VIDEO)
14 Ways to Be a Happier Mom
How Tarot Cards Cured My Nightmares
Robin Gibbs Dies: 5 Greatest Bee Gees Songs (VIDEOS)
A User's Manual for My Daughter to Remember Me By
Stupid Reason #768 Kids Get Suspended From School (VIDEO)
Mom Confession: I Never Wanted to Be a Mother
Why '50 Shades of Grey' Is a Must-Buy for Every Guy
'What to Expect When You're Expecting' Review (VIDEO)
10 Things a Husband Should Never Say to His Wife
11 Beautifully Painted Pregnant Bellies (PHOTOS)
Raising Digital Kids
Best Father-Daughter Dance Ever!
How Do Airplanes Stay in the Sky? -...
Twilight's Disappointing Sex Scene

Comments (8)
A picture of me next to Kim K is a picture that would never see the outside of my camera!! Unlucky Brit. They're both beautiful, but Kim is a few notches above. Stunning.
Brittany looks like a regular, pretty mom/housewife. Kim K in this pic kinda looks like an Escort...
Britney has had two kids. And at least one mental breakdown. She's been at this since she was 11. Kim K wasn't famous until like 2 years ago.
Although, I think Britney needs to get a better hairstylist. Ken Paves or someone. And she's got to lose the blonde. It looks trashy half grown out.