It's Okay to Let Babies Cry It Out if You're a Cold-Hearted Scientist

by Michele Zipp September 11, 2012 at 3:07 PM
199

baby crying in cribWhen I became a mother, I knew that being selfish wasn't an option. I had twins, two little beings with needs I had to fulfill. Each day I learned more and more what not being selfish was, what it was like to put my own needs aside to care for babies who depended on me. It's not easy, but it's beautiful ... what we do as parents.

If my babies didn't fall asleep when I hoped they would, I didn't leave them in their room to cry it out, hoping their little lungs would get tired as they worked themselves up to a cortisol frenzy, stressing out their tiny little bodies while their minds think, Mama isn't coming for me. Why am I alone? My life -- the TV show I wanted to watch, the meal I wanted to eat, the phone call I wanted to make -- was easy to put on hold. I didn't become a mother to let my kids cry their faces off. I didn't become a parent to ignore their needs. But some callous researchers are trying to tell parents that it's fine to let babies cry.

Just like the Australian researchers responsible for this questionable conclusion want you to ignore your child's cries, I want parents to ignore these researchers. What they are saying is damaging because I truly believe it's in every mother's instinct to go to their child if they cry. A mother's instinct should be respected. And the very facts these scientists present are problematic.

More from The Stir: 10 Ridiculous Things I've Done to Not Wake My Newborn

There were only 225 children tracked in this study, and only half went through sleep training, most popularly called crying it out. Yet not all of them cried it out; some parents did the "camping out" method where they stayed in the room to soothe baby often by putting a soft hand on baby's belly to let her know mama is still there if she cried. Here, the parent didn't leave until baby fell asleep. Camping out is not the same as crying it out. I don't think that's enough to make a bold statement that crying it out is okay for babies. Because shouldn't it be a parent's job to make sure baby isn't crying every night at bedtime? When a child cries when he hurts himself, should we ignore those cries, too? If we go with this kind of CIO logic, ignoring a child's cries when he's hurt will help him learn that he will get hurt in life, get over it, move on, shut up because no one cares, no one is going to kiss your boo-boo and make it better.

So how do we deal with our kids' bedtime as parents? What about our lack of sleep, eating food and actually being able to have a moment to chew and enjoy it, having a moment to watch Real Housewives? I think we all deserve that, but when we sign up to become a parent, we often have to put our kids first. I'd rather be the one who cries myself to sleep because I'm overtired than have my child be upset at bedtime. I'd rather bear the burden. I'm bigger, older, stronger. My early life has already been shaped by the decisions my parents made. Now it's my turn to do the best for my children. And to me, letting my kids cry it out isn't the best I can do. It's selfish. Letting my kids cry it out is essentially telling them, Sorry, mommy's not in the mood for this bedtime routine. I have better things to do. Sleep training doesn't seem worth it when there is a risk of damaging my child's brain development.

We also cannot forget that they have linked crying it out with hyperactivity in kids. The study also says that while sleep trained kids turned out fine, the benefits were often short-term. Very often just when a parent thinks their child successfully graduated from crying it out to a good night's sleep, they regress and more "training" needs to happen. That's a sad cycle of too many tears. And the researchers also warn that there are some kids who will not benefit at all from sleep training, and that it may do more harm than good.

Sounds to me that there are too many variables. And when it comes to my kids' health and well-being, that's not something I want to risk. I'll just have another cup of coffee and put my DVR to good use -- and I'll remember it's just a phase. These early years fly by and soon enough your kid will be all grown up and you'll spend mornings wishing she'll wake up and join you for breakfast.

Does this change your mind about crying it out? What do you think of sleep training?

 

Image via tamakisono/Flickr

Like What You Just Read?
Click the "Like" button below to get Natural Parenting stories on Facebook.
Michele Zipp
ABOUT THE AUTHOR Michele Zipp

loves vintage and will defend skinny jeans to the death though she is highly superstitious and "death" is probably a bad word choice. She has a touch of the hoarding disease and enjoys sleuthing, the worst reality shows, and wearing high heels, even at the playground. She's an AP mom of twins, slightly crunchy but with a pedicure.

More


Add Comment

Comments 199

Facebook comment from Brie Sorensen
September 22, 2012 at 1:48 PM
THIS IS INSANE! CRY IT OUT SAVED MY SANITY! My son was waking 5, 6, 7 times a night at 6 months just to comfort nurse. I was going insane. I couldn't drive, wasn't eating, and was falling asleep everywhere. I never showered and couldn't talk or see straight. When i finally got my son to sleep I would lay down on my sons bedroom floor and pass out, only to be awaken 20 minutes later. When I fainted with my son in my arms (luckily my husband was right behind me and caught me and my son before I fell) my husband told me "enough, you can't keep doing this, you look like you're dying!" We started CIO. We made sure all my sons needs were met, and then placed him in his crib. It took about a week and now he sleeps through the night, with the occasional one time a night feed. He is happy, healthy, and thriving. I feel so much better but am still weak. My son never screamed his lungs out, but just would lay there and whine-cry for about 10 mins and go to sleep. I HATE this website! I'm sick of all these, "if you don't breastfeed till your kid is 5, don't co sleep, or dont do baby wearing, you are a bad parent." Screw you
nonmember avatar
Nonmember comment from Brittany
September 25, 2012 at 4:20 PM
Umm "corrinacs" - letting your baby cry for hours alone because they are colicky is NOT an excuse for you to stop being a parent and go to sleep. That is bordering on child abuse.. if your baby is crying for a reason, being in pain, etc. they need you to be there for them. Colic DOES have a reason and it is usually some sort of discomfort, tummy troubles, allergies, etc. Your job as a MOTHER is to FIND that reason and if you can't then hold them and love them through it. You wouldn't leave your child alone to cry it out through a fever would you?
tammy...
tammyc1106
September 27, 2012 at 8:53 AM

As long as your child is fed, dry, and not hurt it's ok if they cry. My children's pediatrician told me to let them cry if all of the above are done. There is no harm in it. He also said babies cry just to cry sometimes and there is nothing wrong with them. My daughter was a screamer at bed time and i did not hold her every night and she turned out perfectly fine!!! If it got to the point where she was screaming uncontrollably then i would go in; hold her for about 10 min and put her down and then the crying would start again. You don't have to coddle your baby every time he or she cries. My daughter who is 9 now does not remember crying herself to sleep for about 6 months. She is a perfectly normal, bright and happy 9 year old. So do I think it's ok to let your child cry themselves to sleep? Absolutely. It does not mean they will grow up to hate you or be a depressed individual. I did it and my kid is fine!!

nonmember avatar
Nonmember comment from Cerri
September 28, 2012 at 1:05 PM
While CIO might not be the best tactic for newborns and infants, as a child grows older, there does come a time when you need to pull back a little. Otherwise, children can very easily end sleeping in a parent's bed on a consistent basis for far too long. There comes a time when a mother responding instantly to a child's cry every time - even when you KNOW they're okay and their needs are met, and they are simply adjusting to a new routine - becomes less about serving in the child's best interest, and more about fulfilling the need in the mother/father (daddies have feelings too <3). It's a fine line to walk, and it's not easy... but not learning how to step away can eventually lead to enabling. Generally, a mom knows her child's cries; when they're in genuine need, and when they're fussing. When in doubt, always check, of course, but... self soothing techniques ARE very important later in life. Being overly attentive can be just as damaging as letting a child CIO for too long or under the wrong circumstances. Being rabidly for or against such techniques seems a little odd, honestly. As long as the technique is used properly, it's not going to hurt the child - indeed, if used at the right time, it can help introduce aforementioned self soothing techniques, which come in handy next time he/she gets a little older and becomes worked up over something that isn't important enough to be so upset over - temper tantrums. Those often escalate because a child hasn't learned how to calm themselves down. Mommy isn't always there to hug everything okay again. And, of course, on the opposite end of the spectrum, parents who adhere strictly to CIO might indeed end up unintentionally harming their child, or ignoring a cry that signals true distress. I'm certainly not suggesting a 'cold-hearted' approach... and I would also argue that any scientist running such a study genuinely wants to help, and is thus not really cold-hearted him/herself. But balance is key. Extremes of any kind are, more often than not, a bad idea. Every child and every family is different... but shunning an approach completely because it would make YOU uncomfortable, even though the child's needs are met, and they are healthy and whole and happy when not working on learning a new routine... well, that seems more like an issue with mommy, not so much a iron-clad argument against a certain technique.
cnb2012
cnb2012
October 4, 2012 at 11:37 AM

This is a VERY irresponsible article.  First of all, the CIO sleep method is NOT synonymous with letting your child cry when they are hurt or hungry etc. It's not meant for ANYTHING other than teaching your child healthy sleep habits.  Secondly, before you make comments such as "Sleep training doesn't seem worth it when there is a risk of damaging my child's brain development", PLEASE, read the actual studies.  The children with emotional, developmental problems, etc are ones who were literally abandoned and whose parents never responded to any cries.  Don't make things up and say sleep training causes those issues because the studies show they don't and when you say things like that it just shows your ignorance. 

cnb2012
cnb2012
October 4, 2012 at 11:37 AM

And please, stop talking about how the prison population results from parents letting their children CIO. That's one of the dumbest things I've ever heard.  I've actually studied this and taken courses about this and there and MANY factors involved in what leads to criminal behavior and simply doing sleep training has NOTHING to do with it.  The lazy parents are the ones who don't bother to educate themselves about what the truth really is, NOT the ones who try in an reasonable manner to teach their children to become independent, well adjusted children.  Now with that said I think you could not do CIO and still have happy well adjusted children but I think the same is true if you do use CIO and do it with careful consideration for how it is working for your family.

nonmember avatar
Nonmember comment from Julia
October 27, 2012 at 2:08 AM
I swore I would NEVER let my baby CIO. And so far, I never have, at least not more than five minutes. But my baby fights sleep like no baby I've ever heard of. We start a gentle, soothing bedtime routine around 7pm, but it takes 3-4 hours (sometimes longer) of my husband and I rocking him, singing lullabies, reading to him, walking him around outside, etc. before he will even stop crying and fall asleep. By 11pm every night, we are EXHAUSTED by the time our baby is asleep. If I want to wash the dishes or run a load of laundry, I have to do it between 11pm and 1am... by which time baby is waking up for the first of many times throughout the night. I get no more than 90-minute blocks of sleep every night and by morning, I am utterly exhausted and crying myself when my baby wakes me up to start the day. Consequently, I have to sleep when he naps, so my house stays a mess. (He won't let me wear him except for walks outside, so housework while he is awake is a no-go.) He is 6 months old and not able or willing to play by himself for more than a few minutes at a time. He needs constant entertainment or he will cry, and I can't stand for him to cry. I have to go to the bathroom while holding him. I AM EXHAUSTED. I thought by now I'd be getting at least 4 hours of sleep a night. I find myself wanting to die, I'm so exhausted, and my DH, who is very hands-on and involved, is too.
nonmember avatar
Nonmember comment from Clark
December 28, 2012 at 4:38 AM
As a father of a child (my second) who at 20 months does not sleep through the night, let me say you are completely wrong. Our first child was sleep trained and is an incredible sleeper. I was able to sleep train her as my wife had evening meetings and was out of the house. My wife no longer has these meetings and therefore I cannot sleep train my second child. He does not sleep through the night at 20 months. If we could let him cry, he would learn to put himself to sleep. People like you drive me nuts. Why do you encourage mom's to avoid obvious solutions. You should feel horribly about what you do on this site.
nonmember avatar
Nonmember comment from Rudy
January 5 at 1:34 PM
Great article.
you are logged in as (logout)
Submitting comment, please wait...
SIGN UP FOR OUR DAILY NEWSLETTER
advertisement
Around the web
Today's Question Tell us what you think!

Have you ever kept a secret from your spouse?

 
X
Welcome to The Stir. It's easy to keep in touch with us: