Remember that proposed circumcision ban in San Francisco? A refresher: A group of intactivists tried to get a ban on the ballot so the people of the Bay Area could vote to ban all circumcision. The implication being baby boy circumcision. As genital mutilation of baby girls is already illegal, and circumcision is not the same on baby boys as it is on baby girls.
This group of determined foreskin soldiers has been documented by filmmaker Jeffrey Braverman, who asks if this is just the beginning of this intact movement. As you see in the trailer for his unfinished doc, he's tackling the religious traditionalists as well. And while it's unclear if Braverman is completely sympathetic to the intactivists position, what is clear is that the film is way too late to this game.
In addition to a judge in San Francisco not allowing this on the ballot, Governor Jerry Brown also signed a law to "ban" the ban. So why are we still talking about it?
Because just like nursing in public, home schooling, and other parenting hot buttons, circumcision gets people all riled up and in each other's drawers. Let's take a look, shall we?
Are you angry? Annoyed? Just tired of listening to what people think about penises?
Religious practice or not, I don't think this issue will go away. But I do think it's going to be a heck of a long time before intactivists make any headway when trying to dictate what other people do with their own babies. After all, when you have grown men taking the circumcision as covenant with god seriously enough to get the snip, it's not a practice that is going to stop overnight. This movement in SF, however, was given a fatal blow. And it's over.
Will you go see this movie?
Image via kickstarter.com


This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
KStew Refuses to Shower
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
This Hot Dad Cooks AND Does the Dishes
















Comments 42
It's not a circumcision ban they just want it to ban anyone under 18 getting one. I agree with the ban let the boys grow up and then when they turn 18 they can make the decision.
No, I won't.
What copgirl112 said. ^^^ It was to stop routine infant circumcision, not ban it altogether. It says that right in the article you linked to.
I probably won't go see the movie. I'd be happy with a ban on routine infant circumcision though.
Just to be clear, I don't dislike circumsized penis'. I've been with a man w/one and w/out, same to me. I have no preferance, it's the being done to babies with no say tgat I'm against..
I don't see the problem?? When it gets done, the babies don't remember it. My husband had it done and my mom allowed it to be done with my brother and if I have a son...he'll get it too. I've heard it's healthier for the guys to not have it. I'm not sure I've ever heard a guy complain because they were circumcised as a baby.
I meant that I've heard it's healthier for guys to not have the extra skin.
I probably won't see this movie but I do NOT support female or male genital mutilation if it's against one's will, be it a baby or adult. If they so choose to get cut, then so be it but let THEM decide what to do with THEIR bodies, whether it's piercings, tattos and what not when they are 18 years of age.