When my first child was an infant, sleep did not always come easily for him (or, as a result, for me or my husband). Some nights our son would conk out on his own and stay asleep through the night (though I'd still wake up to check on him). Other nights, it didn't matter what we tried, our baby wouldn't go to sleep until he was good and ready, and it was impossible to predict when (and how) that time would come.
Many people suggested that we let our son "cry it out" in his crib. "Have you tried 'Ferberizing' him?" they'd say, referring to the methods of Dr. Richard Ferber, a pediatrician who recommends parents let children fall asleep by themselves at bedtime -- even if that means allowing them to cry for extended periods of time -- in order to train them to be self-sufficient. "Ferberizing," such an ugly term. Machine-like. Cold.
My husband and I made a few half-hearted efforts at not responding right away to our baby's cries at night. But we could never really hold out for long. After a minute or two, if our son was still howling, we were by his side or he was in our arms. (Who could sleep through that racket, anyway?) Letting him howl for minutes or even hours on end? Even as every fiber of my being felt drawn to respond, to hold him, shush him, bounce him, and rock him? That just felt like a primal wrong to me.
Ferber's methods have long been controversial (he himself has softened his stance), but now they're being labeled downright dangerous. According to University of Notre Dame psychology professor Darcia Narvaez, research has shown that "letting babies get distressed is a practice that can damage children and their relational capacities in many ways for the long term." What's more, she writes in Psychology Today, "Giving babies what they need leads to greater independence later."
Narvaez maintains that babies cry for a reason and suggests that, when parents don't respond to their infant's cries, it can, among other things, negatively affect the baby's brain development, lead to neural and digestive disorders, keep them from being able to self-regulate and self-comfort, and even "stop growing, stop feeling, stop trusting."
Ugh. This must be terribly frightening news for the many parents who have relied upon (and in many cases, sworn by) the "cry it out" method of sleep training. Even I, with my few random half-hearted attempts at not responding to my infant's nighttime cries, feel a little unsettled. Have I irreparably damaged my child in some way? It makes you realize that, at the end of the day, we really have to trust our own instincts as parents. If an expert's advice doesn't feel right, it probably isn't.
Did you try "cry it out" sleep training with your child?
Image via Chalky Lives/Flickr


This Hot Dad Wants to Do Your Ironing
This Hot Dad Wants to Cook You Dinner
This Hot Dad Cooks AND Does the Dishes
Kanye West is Gay?!
















Comments 119
Never have, never will. If my daughter gets too upset, she throws up. So, why would I purposely allow her to get so worked up like that? IMO, babies cannot get spoiled. My daughter is far from spoiled, and she's co-slept, been cuddled (or "coddled" in an ignorant view), and given every opportunity to love and be loved in return. I think allowing yourself to calm your child teaches them that it's okay to rely on others when they need to.
Hate CIO. I wouldn't ignore my 4 year old's cries, why would I ignore my baby's?
Oh yes, let's demonize the idea of letting babies learn to comfort themselves to sleep. Again.
Here's your stick. Commence beating the dead horse.
Babies can't talk...crying is one of their only means of communication...I would sure hate to be dependent on some one who ignored me when I need them the most.
There's a difference between letting your child scream until they can't any more..and letting them fuss for a bit. The first years are all about understanding your child.
Among many other parenty, I always thought CIO was dangerous...I mean..its not rocket science.
We NEVER did "sleep training". I agree with what was said. An infant needs to be independent!? Yeah...okay. We did the no cry sleep solution and my son is now 18 months old and falls asleep completely on his own and has never cried for hours on end to get there.
I never did sleep training per se, but the only way my son would fall asleep would be for me to leave the room. If I held him, snuggled him, evern sat on a chair where he could see me, he would not sleep. If I left the room, he would cry for maybe 1 minute tops - then fall asleep. It's what worked for him. I always wanted a "cuddly" baby and felt bad about it, but I did what worked for him.
I also know that you can tell the difference between the types of crying - not all crying means the same thing. I could always tell when my baby really needed me (or diaper, or food, or was sick, etc). I think most mothers can. Most people sleep training aren't letting infants cry to the point of throwing up.
Should I hold him and let him scream in my face and kick me? Should I lay him on the floor and let him thrash around and possibly hurt himself?
He's freaking out anyway. He can do that in his crib and take a nap. He screamed for 10 minutes, and he's literally snoring right now.
When he wakes up, he will still love me.