A new study in the Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology says that feeding infants formula in their first days of life prevents babies from developing an allergy to cow's milk.
In the study, the longest and largest prospective study of its kind, the researchers looked at the feeding history of 13,019 infants. Children who were started on infant formula containing cow's milk protein in the first through the 15th days of life were almost completely protected from developing Cows Milk Protein Allergy (CMA) -- 19 times more protected than babies fed cow's milk protein after 15 days. CMA can be dangerous to babies, leading to rashes, respiratory problems, shock and even death, so this boost to the immune system early in life acts as a "vaccination."
What's interesting about this study (besides the obvious) is they recommend that babies get one bottle of formula every day for the first 15 days of life. Something we've been told to avoid at all costs.
Introducing formula later than 15 days has no value and can even trigger a cow's milk allergy if given during the three- to five-month period after birth. Which is the previous recommendation for introducing a bottle, if not introducing formula.
The study doesn't advocate for formula or decry breastfeeding, explaining that you can nurse all day long, just slip in some formula at some point. I had a friend who had to formula feed early on, but was offered a contraption that still allowed the food to be placed near her nipple, so the baby could simulate nursing.
Of course, as the doctor points out, giving the baby a bottle is an excellent way for dad to step in and bond with the baby too.
Will you follow the advice in this study to give formula to your breastfed newborn?
Image via nerissa's ring/Flickr
Funny Valentine's Day Poems to Give Your Kids
Modamily Site Helps You Find Someone to Have a Baby With
Perfect Chocolate-Covered Strawberries
‘No Child Left Behind’ Screeches to a Halt
Brave Girl Won't Let Rare Disease Steal Her Childhood (VIDEO)
Pink Ribbons Hide the Real Truth About Breast Cancer
Would You Wear These Fang Shoes?!
Mom Delivers 15.5 Pound Baby Boy (VIDEO)
Heart Cookie Pops Perfect for Valentine's Day
Obama's Marshmallow Fight at the White House (VIDEO)
7 Things You Can Do Right Now to Prevent Cancer
Beyonce Trademarks 'Blue Ivy' & Starts a Celebrity Trend
5 Great Gifts for Your Techie Valentine
Angelina & Brad Are Letting Maddox Do What?!
Should the Department of Education Be Abolished?

Comments (27)
very interesting!
I wonder what formula company paid for that study!?!?
Saving myself some effort by posting another woman's comment:
This is how I know this guy is an idiot:
http://www.sciencedaily.co m/releases/2010/07/100714162145.htm
"The Tel Aviv University study provides invaluable information for lactation specialists, and possibly for the World Health Organization, which currently recommends that a woman switch from breast to bottle at the three-to-five month period"
Last I checked the WHO says EBF for 6 months...
Anyway here is the real study (Thank you science daily for providing sources for your articles, love you!
Do you see anything in this study about babies EBF for 6+ months and not given cow's milk until 12+ months?? Do you see any info as to whether these babies were BF exclusively before the introduction of cow's milk formula?
http://www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(10)00688-3/abstract
Ninety-eight percent of the cohort participated in the study. The cumulative incidence for IgE-mediated CMA was 0.5% (66/13,019 patients). The mean age of cow's milk protein (CMP) introduction was significantly different (P < .001) between the healthy infants (61.6 ± 92.5 days) and those with IgE-mediated CMA (116.1 ± 64.9 days). Only 0.05% of the infants who were started on regular CMP formula within the first 14 days versus 1.75% who were started on formula between the ages of 105 and 194 days had IgE-mediated CMA (P < .001). The odds ratio was 19.3 (95% CI, 6.0-62.1) for development of IgE-mediated CMA among infants with exposure to CMP at the age of 15 days or more (P < .001). Sixty-four patients with IgE-mediated CMA tolerated soy, and none had a proved allergy to soy.
The same "journalists" have an equally reliable report about a man who has survived with no food or water for 65 years! Clearly not a reliable source for scientific information. http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/ahmedabad/Miracle-fakir-under-med-scanner-again/articleshow/5854603.cms
So no, considering that MULTIPLE, TRUST-WORTHY medical organizations have proved time and time again with study after study for DECADES that even ONE bottle of formula a day is damaging, I hope NO ONE starts supplementing one bottle to all newborns because of this questionable study.
Um.
I think not.
Slip you child a bottle of formula a day... it could possibly kill him, but hey at least he wont be allergic to COWS milk (which we know is vital to the human race). *Eye roll*
Then why does my 2 year old (who has been formula fed with very little breast milk since Day 1) break out in a bleeding, blistery, rash every time we give her anything milk based?
And why is my 11 month old (breastfed, only two 4oz bottles of formula in his entire life) totally "immune" to cows milk?
That's a load of bull.
Nope, I won't do a thing to that virgin gut until they are ready.
That is interesting, but I'm afraid that giving my newborn even one bottle of formula would prevent him from wanting to drink breastmilk-- formula comes out easily and is more filling. What I want to know is how common an allergy to cow's milk is. If it is a very common life threatening condition, I might "vaccinate" my child in this way. If it is rare, then it seems like I would be doing my baby a disservice.